Re: Outer Carbon or Inner Carbon?

Most discussion forums (especially table tennis) are full of posters asking the wrong question based on totally false premises or lack of knowledge about the issue at hand etc. This sub-forum is dedicated to identifying such questions & useless & usually hilarious answers in various tableetnnis forums & also shows what the right answer should have been
Post Reply
User avatar
Mogiert
Posts: 6
Joined: December 21st, 2022, 9:07 pm
Country: Australia
City & State: Launceston, TAS
Playing Style: Wide pips Block and smash
Grip: J/K Pen (Japanese / Korean Penhold) HPG (Hybrid Penhold Grip= TPG+RPG)
Cohort: .
My blade:
Blade Type: .
Side F rubber brand:
Side F rubber type: .
Side B rubber brand:
Side B rubber type: .
Orientation: .

Re: Outer Carbon or Inner Carbon?

Post by Mogiert »

Mogiert wrote: on Tuesday April 21 , 2026 at 6:21 AM #1
But my personal argument is that players and pros way better than me use inner fibre blades and even all woods.
This is one of the common myths among amateurs > Any blade or rubber that works for a pro should also work equally well for a lower level amateur.
Of course this is how the manufacturers prey upon the vain and the clueless
User avatar
Kaffuca
Posts: 13
Joined: September 1st, 2022, 6:17 pm
Country: Australia
City & State: Newstead, TAS
Playing Style: ..
Grip: ..
Cohort: .
My blade:
Blade Type: .
Side F rubber brand:
Side F rubber type: .
Side B rubber brand:
Side B rubber type: .
Orientation: .

Re: Outer Carbon or Inner Carbon?

Post by Kaffuca »

Mogiert wrote: on Tuesday April 21 , 2026 at 6:21 AM #1
Which would you personally pick over the other and why?
Dumb blades with either inner composite or outer composite will work for a pro .
But for some pros it may not be the best choice but they may not even know it.
Pros are successful not because ALL pros use the best equipment to match their style and equipment
But they "seem" successful despite their bad rubber / blade choices because of their superior talent
But that in no way implies they are using the best equipment for their style

Anyway for for almost amateurs , inner composite is a bad choice.
This is because almost all amateurs need smart blades with different layer compositions for backhand from forehand.
They need an actual non-ITTF long pips on backhand.
The backhand side should be softer layers and absolutely no composite layers inner or outer
On the forehand side there are few options

Players who (can) loop on the forehand need a soft outer composite such as a thin layer of ALC or SALC or Kevlar or such
Players who engage in flat hitting style on forehand need a harder outer carbon or composite such as ZLC or SZLC
Players who never learned to loop in their youth or cannot or can no longer loop due to health limitations can also use the same the second option in most cases.
If a player decides to use high friction type rubber with thicker sponge on forehand with which they can even fake loop or even lob , then they would want a frictionless type actual non-ITTF long pips ITTF slim pips on backhand. Even in this case you want a softer no composite backhand side to enhance the disruption with your FLP

In all cases the composite (outer) layer side must have maximum isolation from the soft backhand side. This is the tricky part of bad design.
You probably need a thick balsa coreor such to maximize isolation of BH & FH sides.
User avatar
King Spin
Posts: 8
Joined: March 29th, 2026, 2:46 pm
Country: United States of America (USA)
City & State: Verona , NJ
Playing Style: ..
Grip: ..
Cohort: .
My blade:
Blade Type: .
Side F rubber brand:
Side F rubber type: .
Side B rubber brand:
Side B rubber type: .
Orientation: .

Re: Outer Carbon or Inner Carbon?

Post by King Spin »

Obviously this topic is in this section because the correct question would have been "Outer composite or inner composite" :roll:
Post Reply
  • Similar Topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post

Return to “Right Answers to the wrong question (Blind leading the blind)”