iocTT.com :Most advanced multi-lingual discussion forum for tabletennis (Factual / parody). Uncensored. Free discreet membership to post. Simple registration. No email needed.

merlin el mago wrote: on February 5, 2026 #16
If the long pips are ITTF allowed forget generating heavy backspin with long pips!!!

I am sorry but I have to push back hard on this.
Unless you are being sarcastic or something. Then I apologize.

Otherwise I absolutely have no idea what you are talking about here.
Please explain

So you support the long pips ban of 1977 and the Durban Aspect Ratio Reduction Massacre of 1998 and the Pip density reduction regulation of 2004 ?

Are you saying then that only slim pips be continued to be allowed in iTTF and long pips ban of 1977 should continue ?

SERIOUSLY ?

Cora wrote: ↑April 13th, 2026, 10:42 pm

merlin el mago wrote: on February 5, 2026 #16
If the long pips are ITTF allowed forget generating heavy backspin with long pips!!!

I am sorry but I have to push back hard on this.
Unless you are being sarcastic or something. Then I apologize.

Otherwise I absolutely have no idea what you are talking about here.
Please explain

So you support the long pips ban of 1977 and the Durban Aspect Ratio Reduction Massacre of 1998 and the Pip density reduction regulation of 2004 ?NO

Are you saying then that only slim pips be continued to be allowed in iTTF and long pips ban of 1977 should continue ?NO

SERIOUSLY ?

YES

merlin el mago wrote: ↑April 14th, 2026, 9:13 pm

Cora wrote: ↑April 13th, 2026, 10:42 pm

merlin el mago wrote: on February 5, 2026 #16
If the long pips are ITTF allowed forget generating heavy backspin with long pips!!!

I am sorry but I have to push back hard on this.
Unless you are being sarcastic or something. Then I apologize.

Otherwise I absolutely have no idea what you are talking about here.
Please explain

So you support the long pips ban of 1977 and the Durban Aspect Ratio Reduction Massacre of 1998 and the Pip density reduction regulation of 2004 ?NO

Are you saying then that only slim pips be continued to be allowed in iTTF and long pips ban of 1977 should continue ?NO

SERIOUSLY ?

YES

I understand now
I think this is some language translation error
I think you meant to say
If the long pips are NOT allowed by ITTF , then forget generating heavy backspin with long pips!!!
and you did NOT mean to say
If the long pips are ITTF allowed forget generating heavy backspin with long pips!!!

Which also means you oppose & NOT support the long pips ban of 1977 and the Durban Aspect Ratio Reduction Massacre of 1998 and the Pip density reduction regulation of 2004

Anyway I apologize about the misunderstanding on my part of what you meant. My fault

But I would suggest that you edit your post in TableTennis Daily to make it clear what you meant by adding a NOT ( The post I am responding to here)

No need to apologize, English isn't my native language so wait a lot of mistakes of my part.

Modified the TTD post.