Anyone tried XVT MONSTER SUPER MAX Long Pimples

As most of you may not know for sure, pips rubbers listed on ITTF LARC are 200% functionally useless in the 40+ plastic ball ONLY era. This section is for discussion about older rubbers from 38 mm ball era & 40- celluloid ball ere that may be still more functionally useful in the 40+ plastic ball era than rubbers designed for 40+ plastic ball ONLY era. This section also discusses new rubbers that are not listed on ITTF LARC but are functionally superior to rubbers currently listed on current ITTF LARC. Contrary to popular myth ITTF is NOT the sole supreme authority on table tennis & you are free to use these super functional rubbers as you wish. The question of who will play against you is a just only a matter of who are your true friends in table tennis & not ITTF rules or regulations especially at lower levels & especially in tournaments not affiliated with ITTF (incorrectly referred to as “unsanctioned” tournaments)
Post Reply
User avatar
GGooc
Posts: 2
Joined: September 7th, 2022, 11:52 am
Country: England
City & State: keighley
Playing Style: ..
Grip: ..
Cohort: .
My blade:
Blade Type: .
Side F rubber brand:
Side F rubber type: .
Side B rubber brand:
Side B rubber type: .
Orientation: .

Anyone tried XVT MONSTER SUPER MAX Long Pimples

Post by GGooc »

https://www.aliexpress.us/item/3256808059556059.html
Top
Golf freak
Posts: 2
Joined: September 27th, 2022, 1:59 pm
Country: Australia
City & State: Broadbeach , QLD
Playing Style: ..
Grip: ..
Cohort: .
My blade:
Blade Type: .
Side F rubber brand:
Side F rubber type: .
Side B rubber brand:
Side B rubber type: .
Orientation: .

Re: Anyone tried XVT MONSTER SUPER MAX Long Pimples

Post by Golf freak »

Pimples Height: 3.3mm
Pimples diameter: 2.5mm
Aspect Ratio = 1.32

For every ball size (& material) , there probably is an optimal pip length for maximal effectiveness
3.3 mm may be suitable for 44 mm ball (use \d in Japan) but not for the 40 mm ball
2.5 mm to 2.8 mm ay be optimal for 40 mm ball

The aspect ratio of 1.32 may be too low . A value of 1.5 is ideal for 40 mm ball
Top
Post Reply
  • Similar Topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post

Return to “Please only use Super Functional Rubbers (not listed on ITTF LARC) as much as possible”